tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6433941530167569659.post1539896581178116650..comments2024-03-04T07:33:09.398-05:00Comments on The Phillies Room: Planning the 2016 Chachi Set - Part OneJimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06161762602291616465noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6433941530167569659.post-89130581831552356672015-06-28T16:56:24.961-04:002015-06-28T16:56:24.961-04:00Thanks for the warning on Revere!
And thanks for ...Thanks for the warning on Revere!<br /><br />And thanks for the head's up on the Koffee font. That matches the 1970 script exactly. And 1970 Topps pulls ahead as the early favorite . . .Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06161762602291616465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6433941530167569659.post-36972608651896861722015-06-28T16:11:51.760-04:002015-06-28T16:11:51.760-04:00By the way, Ben Revere is on my fantasy team as of...By the way, Ben Revere is on my fantasy team as of today, so if he goes into a slump, gets injured or spontaneously combusts, I'm to blame.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6433941530167569659.post-79860698438700378502015-06-28T11:14:59.883-04:002015-06-28T11:14:59.883-04:00If nothing else, *I* eagerly await the announcemen...If nothing else, *I* eagerly await the announcement... but I'm guessing you knew that already.<br /><br />As a child of the 1970's, I find all four of these candidates to be <br />appealing. I agree that, for your own sanity, you should avoid 1972.<br /><br />1970 and 1978 are have the advantage of having been "done" the least out of the candidates. <br /><br />1971 has a visually striking design that would easily lend itself to making subsets that didn't exist in the original (i.e. 2016 Highlights).<br /><br />I read somewhere - Bob Lemke's blog? - that the font used for 1970 is Koffee. If that's not what you're using on your prototype, you might want to check it out.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com