tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6433941530167569659.post2973484777849437296..comments2024-03-04T07:33:09.398-05:00Comments on The Phillies Room: 1986 Topps PhilliesJimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06161762602291616465noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6433941530167569659.post-25758184617925740172021-08-25T15:21:55.550-04:002021-08-25T15:21:55.550-04:00Not really, and it probably just comes down to col...Not really, and it probably just comes down to collector preference. Since Rose is featured on Phillies Topps cards on those two cards, I'd consider them to be Reds / Phillies cards for team set purposes. And like you, I have the Ontiveros card as an honorary Phillies card given Schmidt's cameo.Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06161762602291616465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6433941530167569659.post-3502507954480277492021-08-22T17:18:27.587-04:002021-08-22T17:18:27.587-04:00Do you really think the Rose cards need to be in t...Do you really think the Rose cards need to be in the set to be complete? I used to add any card that had a phillie in it..ex Steve Ontiveros 1976 card has Schmidt on it too.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01361547931991918462noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6433941530167569659.post-21972642861374297922012-03-29T08:50:41.111-04:002012-03-29T08:50:41.111-04:00As your friend at the oh my o-pee-chee! blog illus...As your friend at the oh my o-pee-chee! blog illustrated, the 1986 OPC card of Steve Bedrosian, with the Phillies name on top, could pass for a Phillies card, what with his blue jacket an lack of any Braves clothing on:<br /><br />http://ohmyopc.blogspot.com/2010/12/1986-steve-bedrosian.html<br /><br />So in my set it does--it's the 37th card of the team set! (It does necessitate that I use an extra 9-pocket sheet, though.)Steve F.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00753488569249068229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6433941530167569659.post-18129168506423441042011-11-28T21:24:26.109-05:002011-11-28T21:24:26.109-05:00Agreed and updated. : )Agreed and updated. : )Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06161762602291616465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6433941530167569659.post-33998994345297341262011-11-28T13:19:41.997-05:002011-11-28T13:19:41.997-05:00I have to politely disagree about '86 being Sc...I have to politely disagree about '86 being Schmidt's last great season. What about '87? He hit .293, with 35 homers and 113 RBIs. And he did that in 13 fewer games.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com